"It's shameful that the UDF party wants to take us back to the dark days,"

Mr Gwanda Chakuamba (2003)

search antimuluzi.blogspot.com

Sunday, June 25, 2006

US grants Malawi $20mil to fight corruption

June 25, 2006, By AND

Lilongwe (AND) The governments of Malawi and the United States of America this week launched an ambitious K2.9 billion ($20.9 million) programme that will assist the country to combat corruption and tighten fiscal mismanagement.

Economic Planning and Development Minister David Faiti launched the programme, called Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) Threshold program, in Lilongwe, Malawi, alongside United States Ambassador to Malawi Alan Eastham.

Under the programme, which will later see Malawi qualify for a full Millennium Challenge Account (MCA), the US government will provide $20.9 million over a period of two years.

Eastham said the program will help the Malawi government to strengthen institutions responsible for investigating and prosecuting corrupt activities and put systems in place to achieve fiscal management by ensuring accountability and transparency.

“This programme is a threshold of a larger programme that the US government is undertaking around the world. An effective implementation of this program will help the Malawi government to qualify for a much larger and comprehensive program,” said Eastham.

He said money from the Millennium Challenge Threshold programme will also support training of prosecutors, judges, and investigators of corruption for them to effectively deal with corruption cases.

Eastham said the money will also be used to strengthen the National Assembly, the Auditor General, the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB), the Malawi Police Service, the Accountant General’s office, the Malawi Revenue Authority (MRA), the National Audit office, the Ministry of Finance and other government institutions.

“This will help to improve the budget process by tightening fiscal management systems, achieve more frequent and professional government audits, and improve management of domestic and international debt, among others,” said Eastham.

He said part of the funds will also be used to improve the investigative reporting of the media as well as civil society organisations as watchdogs against corrupt activities.

In his speech, Faiti said the Malawi government, under the leadership of President Bingu wa Mutharika, qualified for the Millennium Challenge Threshold programme because it has shown a promising track record in issues of good governance and the fight against corruption.

He said the programme will help the government to uproot main sources of corruption and strengthen prudent and sound economic management.

“Government is committed to the elimination of corruption, fraud and fiscal mismanagement as this help to ensure that the limited resources are used effectively to benefit that majority of our people and not into the pockets of a few,” said Faiti.

The Economic Planning Minister said he was optimistic that Malawi will meet targets set under the program and qualify for the Millennium Challenge Account.

“Malawi has demonstrated a commitment to undertake policy reforms necessary to improve conditions for development and is close to qualifying for full Millennium Challenge Account,” said Faiti.

US President George W Bush devised the Millennium Challenge Account as measure of US foreign aid from the traditional donations to investment. Under the programme, the US government gives substantial amounts of money up to $200 million to countries that have demonstrated a commitment to better the health and education of their people.

Lilongwe Bureau

Thursday, June 22, 2006

Muluzi returns Monday to face Malawi Anti-Corruption Bureau
by Mabvuto Banda, 21 June 2006 - 05:48:54
Former President Bakili Muluzi returns home next Monday, but it may not be a happy comeback because the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) is lurking around with questions for his alleged involvement in the abuse of public funds through some diplomatic missions.
A senior United Democratic Front (UDF) official on Monday said Muluzi is due back on June 26.
The British Home Office gave Muluzi a six-month visa which expires this month after recuperating from two operations on his spinal cord.
UDF spokesperson Sam Mpasu declined to disclose the date of Muluzi’s arrival Tuesday but said he is coming next week.
“I know that he is coming back but I cannot disclose the date because we have information that they have prepared a warrant of arrest for Muluzi and want to arrest him upon arrival,” said Mpasu.
Atupele Muluzi, son to the former leader, said the family is not aware of any such plans against his father.
“As a family, we are just looking forward to welcoming him back after going through a major operation, but it is surprising that every time Parliament is meeting such rumours abound,” said Atupele.
ACB Director Gustave Kaliwo said Tuesday the bureau only wants Muluzi to clarify on their latest findings regarding several issues.
“I cannot say that we are arresting him, there are just several outstanding matters that we would like to clarify with him about the money that went through embassies that we understand was used by him,” said Kaliwo.
He did not disclose how much money is involved.
The ACB has been probing two former envoys — John Chikago, former High Commissioner to Japan, and Ziliro Chibambo, former ambassador to Mozambique.
Muluzi has several outstanding issues with the ACB, ranging from probe on how he built Keza Building in the commercial city of Blantyre to allegations that he diverted close to K1.4 billion from donors into his personal account.
The bureau is also yet to conclude the case in which it accuses the former president of buying over 100 vehicles without paying duty. He later donated the cars to his party, the UDF.
Last year, the bureau summoned Muluzi to answer questions on his alleged involvement in the K1.4 billion case but that never happened and the bureau went ahead to confiscate his computers at his BCA Hill residence in Blantyre.
Death of a democrat?
by Bright Molande, 22 June 2006 - 04:45:44
It was from the darkening sky of 14 June that he came. Just on the day we cry Long Live Genuine Democracy, Chakufwa Chihana was landed after a long flight of his soul. Cry, the beloved Chihana.
He was first to openly cast a stone against dictatorship as an individual. Now dead, Long Live Democracy! He was an epic hero, once though.
While Dr Hastings Kamuzu Banda was still a dictator, Chihana landed at Kamuzu International Airport in the dust of the storm of change and opened the Pandora’s Box. Change was here and no-one could stop it. Even vendors of the holy weed crawled out in white robes and sheep skins to preach democracy.
Chihana briefly appeared from the clouds and soon disappeared in the dust of the storm of prison life. Only his two fingers rudely remain in our memory, pointing at the path to our destiny.
But his voice was a little match that ignited the roaring fire that leapt and advanced to devour the ruling crocodiles and jackals that wagged their tails around Kamuzu Banda. They charged back, threatening to devour the preachers of our salvation. Kamuzu said “not in my name”.
He whose voice echoed from Sapitwa to Nyika, “If I should die, my blood will be the fuel of democracy,” today, his death speaks of freedom better than his precious life.
Alone, he braved trials of the times behind the prison bars of crocodile jaws while the Alliance for Democracy (Aford), the pressure group he led, caught the fire of change and roared across the nation. Even sceptical professors jumped in and sang, “Onward Malawian Soldiers, Marching as to Freedom.” It was a national cause.
But, “Chihana came out of prison only to pack Aford back to kuthengere, digging its political bunker which has turned out to be its grave in the North,” a well informed analytical journalist at The Nation now laments.
He became too wiser than his people. He forgot, no man is greater than his people. Aford was buried in the North, buried with the cherished dream of dragging the North to the centre without thinking nationally. Shame!
Politically, Chihana lived the life of the dead long before his physical death. “Only Chihana and his daughter-in-law make Aford,” shall be the last of the leading headlines celebrating his political career. The corrosive disillusionment caused by Messiah still haunts our political nightmares.
Former President Bakili Muluzi the (other) Father of Democracy dragged Chihana around like a kid puppet while he flowed downstream like a lifeless fish that could no longer swim upstream. And when Lucius Banda mourned in his song that “All he knows is just how to follow,” we knew the political stamina to lead was long lost in political power.
And Muluzi mocked him, “some of these parties will end like curtains.” Chakufwa the Democrat picked up the wisdom and tore his party with his own hands.
The democrat set out and retreated to Sapitwa—out of reach in his blind quest to become a god, now all gone and dead. As we bury the remains of this freedom fighter, will his disciples really bury his spirit?
But Chihana deserved a state funeral, buried in a stately casket and not a coffin (although a “casket” is only American English while “coffin” is British English for the same thing we call bokosi). That must not speak of his social status but of what he was, once.
He remains a man who truly fought for change. And, he served our bellies as a Vice-President as well in the fog of Muluzi’s democratic reign. Chihana’s political death was a national tragedy while his physical demise is only a sad end of an era, the tragic end of a life. He must be remembered and “mourned well” either way.
Once, Chihana was a national hero. Times have been when he was cut out for a Hero’s Acre. And when a friend sends me a text message wondering, “mourning a villain?” That disturbs me.
But then, even villains must be mourned without tears. To jeer at the dead is to be worse than a heartless villain. This hero who died twice needs a well of tears from the springs of our cracked hearts.
After all, Chihana’s political death is a tragedy many of our politicians are bound to go if they are not seeing and living a vision of the changing times. We will bury them without our tears, lest we should sprout a curse of democracy on their mounds.
But a messiah who came to fight a lion with two fingers on our behalf cannot be a villain. He must have meant well, once, but tripped in the fog of power lust.
Chihana is a hero who only forgot us and sought himself in the foggy jungle of power where no self-seeker ever returns. When he fell, we all fell and broke the backbone of the nation. We are still recovering.
While death is the loneliest footpath of the soul, Chihana’s political death was a collective steep slippery road of our country. He came with the political stamina to forbid Muluzi from doing the worst he has done to his people. He heroically faced the roaring lion and all his hungry cubs anyway.
But perhaps, Chihana and Muluzi were only best as freedom fighters. The country still needed one measuring to intellectual stature of Dr Banda and President Bingu wa Mutharika to “see a vision” and mobilise us to “live the vision”.
It appears, though, that Chihana walked out of the prison spell with his own Gweru colour dreams. They soon became political hallucinations that must have haunted him to his deathbed. Just like Muluzi, he saw no vision and therefore lived no vision.
It is the death of Chihana the hero that I therefore mourn. He came as a political messiah and died even thus and thus.
His political death dug social graves for underdogs in the squalor of poverty who can only welcome all such self-seeking politicians with greetings of the dead:
The grave you dug below is all astir
to meet you at your coming;
Rousing the spirits of the departed
to greet you—and

You will find us waiting here
Playing chess among the dead
Calculating how you missed
A grand move of a life chance
And when you descend, first—
Shaking skeletal hands of the dying
Hugging creaking naked skeletons
Wondering how you mounted
Your Gweru dreams for power greed
And sold your soul to power!

O, how the mighty are fallen!
How the mighty are fallen!

—The author is a poet, literature scholar and social critic from the University of Malawi, Chancellor College
—Feedback: amolande@chanco.unima.mw

Eyes into Africa’s bright future
by Mzati Nkolokosa, 21 June 2006 - 06:34:16
The first wave of partnership in Africa was in the 1960s. But it was not for long. Coups, disease, hunger and wars became part of life. Now there is hope and Africa is moving forward to realise rue independence.
March 6, 1957, was a defining day in Africa’s history. Gold Coast, Ghana from this date, attained independence from Britain.
The country’s founding President Kwame Nkrumah, speaking without a prepared speech or notes, was an inspiration to all Africa.
“The independence of Ghana is meaningless unless it is linked with the total liberation of Africa,” he declared.
It was a speech from the heart. And Nkrumah meant it, because a year later, he called African liberation leaders to Ghana to strategise the continent’s independence struggle.
The fruits were soon to be seen. Twenty African countries were independent by 1960.
Dr Hastings Kamuzu Banda was in Ghana and admired Nkrumah’s success. It was from Ghana that Banda was invited to help Malawi’s struggle for independence.
Why did Orton Chirwa and others invite Banda when there were other Malawians outside the country?
The answer is simple. Banda—and other educated Africans—was motivated by Nkrumah and supported the struggle in Malawi.
Namibia’s founding President Sam Nujoma describes Nkrumah as a “progressive president, an accomplished academic, an incisive thinker, analyst and writer, and a legendary pan-African revolutionary.”
Indeed he was, at least seen with an understanding mind and smelled by scholarly nostrils. Nkrumah knew the importance of industrialisation.
In nine years he established 68 state-owned factories. He listed some of them in his 1963 book, Africa Must Unite: a distillery, a coconut oil factory, a brewery, a milk-processing plant and a lorry and bicycle plant. There were agreements for a large, modern oil refinery, an iron and steel works, a flour mill, sugar, textile and cement factories.
The New African editor Baffour Ankomah says Nkrumah forgot factories for shoes, glass, meat, gold, fruit and tomato, chocolate and a radio and television assembly plant.
This, says Ankomah, was in addition to building a huge hydroelectric plant at Akasombo—that major source of electricity studied in Malawi’s primary school geography, a motorway from Accra to Tema and free educational and medical services “that made Ghana a showcase for Africa.”
Further, Ghana had a continental radio station broadcasting beyond Africa. The radio, say analysts, helped the African liberation struggle.
“For unless we attain economic freedom, our struggle for independence would have been in vain, and our plans for social and cultural advancement frustrated,” says Nkrumah in his book.
But this progress did not last. Nkrumah was overthrown on February 24, 1966, while in Peking (now Beijing) on his way to Vietnam with plans to end the American war.
“It is difficult to imagine the greatly improved condition of the African people today if Nkrumah had continued in power in Ghana to lead the pan-African movement,” says June Milne, Nkrumah’s research and editorial assistant.
“One of the most shocking incidents in Africa was the overthrow, in February 1966, of that great man. I don’t think we will ever recover from those events,” writes Zambia’s founding President Kenneth Kaunda in the New African of February this year.
Nkrumah wanted and fought for a united Africa, one that could progress together. He thought a united Africa should have a one-word-name: Africa.
“There is no time to waste. We must unite now or perish,” said Nkrumah at the historic OAU meeting in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, in 1963.
“Kwame Nkrumah was [Ghana’s] leader, but he was our leader too, for he was an African leader,” said Tanzania’s founding President Julius Nyerere in Accra in 1997 when Ghana celebrated 40 years of independence.
Scholars—and all critical minds—can only reflect at history with wonder.
Major-General Henry Templer Alexander, last British Chief of Defence Staff in Ghana dismissed by Nkrumah, had no kind words for the architect of one Africa. Nkrumah “is not a brave man...nowadays he keeps himself very much confined,” says Alexander in his book Africa Tightrope
Colonel Afrifa, who was part of the coup, says in The Ghana Coup, Nkrumah could have been a great man.
“He started well...and became...the symbol of emergent Africa. Somewhere down the line, however, he became ambitious... and ruthlessly used powers invested in him by his own constitution. He developed a strange love for absolute power,” says Afrifa.
What went wrong in Ghana between 1957 and 1966?
“It is likely that historians will be asking that question for many years to come,” says The New Africans, a Reuters guide to the history of Africa’s founding leaders.
Indeed it’s a question that needs an answer because the link between Nkrumah’s end and the rise of dictatorships in Africa is becoming clear. Why did, for example, leaders like Banda and Kaunda, who were close to Nkrumah, turn to one-party politics?
Nkrumah established a one party state and controlled his Convention People’s Party (CPP) and all the organs of state; dismissed security chiefs and judges at will.
Was Nkrumah just that bad to enjoy absolute power? Perhaps the challenges of his presidency can help explain.
He faced at least seven assassination attempts. But one was most apparent. On August 1, 1962, a grenade was thrown at a village of Kulungugu, in northern Ghana, where he stopped on his way from meeting President Maurice Yameogo of Upper Volta.
Four people died, 56 injured, most of them seriously. Nkrumah escaped without any injuries but saw everything that happened. It was a dehumanising experience. He later wrote of how a cheering crowd turned into “a screaming mass of people, blood stained, limping [and] disfigured”.
The incident was followed by others. But the Kulungugu attack disturbed him. He lost confidence in Ghana Police and organised a private army with Russian help on January 2, 1964.
On this date, a constable named Ametewee chased Nkrumah, fired five shots at him, missed, but killed the chief presidential guard, Salifu Dagarti.
It was another disturbing and dehumanising incident but not the first, not the last. He had endured a lot which his friends—Kamuzu, Kaunda, Nyerere and others—heard.
This is perhaps the reason why Nkrumah turned into a dictator. He was pushed into a corner and had no choice but to protect his life and the interests of his people.
Some African leaders, like Kamuzu, perhaps became dictators, dealing with every opposition immediately, for fear of being the next Nkrumah, Africa’s model.
The military coup that ended Nkrumah’s rule was organised by the CIA with support from London and carried out by local collaborators in Ghana, according to information released in recent years the West.
It is easy to blame the US and Britain. But the major culprits were Africans who collaborated with the West.
Since then Africa has mainly been a sad story. Portugal handed over power to Africans in Angola and Mozambique but civil wars followed immediately. Malawi was host to over a million Mozambican refugees in the 1980s until mid 1990s.
Some remained and have become Malawians just like that confirming perhaps one of Nkrumah’s dream that Africans must be one, have one passport and move freely in their continent which was to become a country.
There was war in Liberia, Burundi, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Nigeria, Burundi, and trouble in Zaire.
South Africa was struggling with apartheid. There was no peace in Ethiopia. People are still fighting in Somalia, Sudan, Ivory Coast and Uganda and many other counties.
It has largely been a hopeless Africa, perhaps traced from Nkrumah’s troubles and fall.
But all that is changing now. Of course, Nkrumah’s fall was a setback because all African leaders were affected. And Kaunda was not exaggerating the effects when he suggested that Africa would not recover from the coup and its effects.
Yet there is light. Slowly Africa is moving and into the right direction. The wars in Mozambique, Angola, Liberia, Rwanda and Sierra Leone are over.
Mozambique and Angola are prospering. Liberia has a highly educated President, Ellen-Johnston Sirleaf, who is a symbol of a bright future for the war-torn country. President Paul Kagame of Rwanda has made significant changes to bring lasting peace and economic boom to his country.
He was at the White House recently talking to President George Bush, sharing a vision while their ministers were signing treaties to boost trade. Rwanda remains the world’s best example on women representation in decision making positions.
There are serious peace efforts in DR Congo, Ivory Coast, Sudan and attempts at normalising Somalia.
Nigeria, a country of coups and assassinations, has been at peace with a civilian president for close to a decade. That is an achievement and a pointer to a brighter future.
Africa shares its fears and hopes. Most countries have held elections yet that is not democracy. The main challenge facing emerging democracies is rushed elections assumed to bring liberty and therefore liberal democracy.
The good news is that now there is willingness, even pressure from within, for liberation and that starts with liberalising the economy which leads to political liberalisation because liberalised economy leads to modernisation.
Dictatorships were brought down in the 1990s. The IMF, World Bank and donors were able to do this in Africa and elsewhere bringing hope that soon vanished because there was no meaningful replacement and countries were plundered in a way that is very difficult to reconstruct.
Still there is a real chance for Africa to move forward.
British Chancellor of the Exchequer writing in The Guardian in January challenged Africa, saying it is the continent’s time to move forward.
“A century ago,” he said, “people talked of ‘what we could do to Africa’. Last century, it was ‘what can we do for Africa’. Now, in 2006, we must ask what the developing world, empowered, can do for itself.”
Nkrumah, born September 21 in 1909, had a vision for Africa, for a big country to be called Africa, one that could take advantage of its natural resources—land, forests, fresh water and hard working people—to develop.
Sadly he died on April 27, 1972, in exile in Guinea, without seeing that vision. Instead Ghana and Africa had become a land of coups, wars, hunger and disease.
In Nkrumah’s words, these problems, coming after independence, forced Africa to make one step backward. Now, he said in a visionary statement in 1966, “we shall take two forward”.
It is happening now. Africa is moving forward and it’s good news, sweet news. The sweeter news is that Malawi, with President Bingu wa Mutharika, is moving along with eyes fixed into Africa’s bright future.
It is time to join Mutharika in serious, visionary thoughts about Malawi, a country in which we live, not for ourselves, but for our children and their children—from whom we have borrowed Malawi, a piece of land which we are expected to return better than we found it.
—Feedback: mzatinews@yahoo.com

Saturday, June 17, 2006

Malawi 06/07 budget ups agriculture, water funding
Fri Jun 16, 2006 6:26 PM GMT16


By Mabvuto Banda

LILONGWE (Reuters) - Malawi's Finance Minister Goodall Gondwe on Friday unveiled the budget for 2006/2007, sharply raising the amount of money allocated for agricultural and irrigation programs in the drought-stricken African nation.

"Never again shall we become so hopeless and force to beg for food," Gondwe said as he announced the increases for the ministries of agriculture and water and irrigation, both considered crucial to fighting hunger in Malawi.

Almost half of Malawi's 12 million people were in need of food relief last year following a drought.

The new budget raises the agriculture ministry's allocation to $43 million from $14 million and the water and irrigation ministry's funding to $14 million from $6 million, Gondwe announced.

He also pledged to continue the fertilizer and maize subsidy that is believed to have improved agriculture production.

The budget is seen as key for Malawi's ability to qualify for debt relief and resolve its chronic food shortages.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) board meets later this month to decide whether the impoverished southern African nation qualifies for debt relief. Gondwe has said it will only occur if legislators pass the budget.

"This is not only the responsibility of the IMF board and our executive, but it is also a responsibility of this parliament to pass the budget because it anchors the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PGRF) with the Fund, which is crucial to multilateral debt relief," he said in a speech.

The proposed budget also aims to reduce spending to 28.7 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2006/07 from 32.2 percent in 2005/06, while repaying domestic debt.

Gondwe, a former World Bank economist, forecast a drop in inflation to 10.4 percent by December 2006 from over 15 percent last year. Inflation has been on a downward trend in Malawi, hitting 16.1 percent in April following 16.6 percent in March.

He projected the economy would expand by 8.4 percent from a sluggish 2.1 percent last year on account of the anticipated bumper harvest, which was helped by good rains and the introduction of the fertilizer and maize subsidy.